Obama: ‘Maybe I Should Just Pack Up and Go Home’

Obama: ‘Maybe I Should Just Pack Up and Go Home’ | CNS News



President Barack Obama

I happen to agree with President Obama's statement that he should pack up and go home.  That's the best thing he can do for our country.  Better yet, he should not only go home himself but he should take Nancy Pelosi, John Boehner, Eric Cantor, Harry Reid, James Clyburn, Mitch McConnell, and scores of other Democrats and RINO's with him.  The best thing that can happen is for our President and Congressman to resign.  We need another president and a new slate of Representatives and Senators, regardless of political party.  They're all the problem.  I would vote in a heartbeat for him to pack up and go home.  Just take Congress and the Senate with you.

To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Pelosi: 'Unleash' Women Via 'Affordable Quality Childcare for All'

Pelosi: 'Unleash' Women Via 'Affordable Quality Childcare for All' | CNS News

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi told a gathering in Cleveland earlier this month that America needs to "unleash" women by providing "affordable" child care for all American children--a proposal which she claimed that President Richard Nixon wrongfully vetoed in 1971.  In 1971 both houses of Congress passed a bill which would require a national daycare to be established in the United States.  Nixon vetoed the bill stating that it would not be good for the family unit.  He was right.  It's not the role of government to establish childcare in the U.S.   It still isn't the role of government to establish daycare in the United States.  Children aren't "wards" of the state, which I believe Ms. Pelosi believes it's so.  It's the role of mom and dad to raise children--not the government.

If Ms. Pelosi is so concerned about unleashing women, then why doesn't government abolish the present burdensome tax code so that only a flat tax is levied amongst all Americans, regardless of income.  That would make it a lot easier for more mothers to stay home with their children.  The tax burden makes it very difficult for households to make it on one income, which is the way it should be ideally.  It's terrible when it almost requires two incomes to make ends meet.  I know there are many situations where two couples have to make an income due to various circumstances.  However, that's not the way it should be.  The truth is Ms. Pelosi and her minions want to control the daily lives of Americans.  That's unAmerican, unBiblical and anti-family.

To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Obama to Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz: "God Bless You"

Obama to Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz: "God Bless You" | LifeNews.com

President Obama speaking at Planned Parenthood   There's nothing more despicable than when a president invokes God's name to endorse something as evil as Planned Parenthood does--that is to suck out the life of innocent children in the mother's womb.  Planned Parenthood over the years has assisted in the murder of millions of unborn children.  It's a national travesty.  God have mercy on us as a country and God help us that our nation re-elected Barack Obama last fall.   To hear the video, click on the above link from LifeNews.com.

Politics on hold at the dedication of Bush library

Politics on hold at the dedication of Bush library | CNS News

Former President George W. Bush flanked by current President Barack Obama, former presidents Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Jimmy Carter

On Thursday April 25, 2013 several of the former presidents gathered together to dedicated the new George W. Bush presidential library in Dallas, Texas.  Several of the former presidents praised Bush and had a very lighthearted time together.  Of course, that's something that always takes place at the dedication of a former president's library.  Truthfully speaking, they are all a group of elitists with one common goal to bring about a new world order or a one world government.  Some may say that they might have disagreements on various issues, depending upon the political party affiliation.  The truth is they have more in common with one another than some may realize.  Some of the partisan rancoring that supposedly takes place is nothing but a facade.  They are all in this together.  They are "one" with a common goal to bring about this global government.  I don't get really excited over such things as the dedication of a presidential library because I believe everything they're doing isn't for the sake of promoting America.  It's about destroying the foundation that built America.  It doesn't make any difference what political party they're affiliated with.  That's sad but I believe it's true.  These last few presidents have brought America to the point she is today, and I don't believe that's an accident. 

To read the full story about the events of this past Thursday's presidential library dedication, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Reps Challenge DHS Ammo Buys, Say Agency Using 1000 More Rounds Per Person Than Army

Reps challenge DHS ammo buys, say agency using 1,000 more rounds per person than Army | Fox News




Republic Rep. Jason Chaffetz stated Thursday that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is using roughtly using 1000 rounds of ammuntition more per person than the U.S. Army, as he and other lawmakers sharply questioned DHS officials on their massive bullet buys.  Chaffetz stated, "It's entirely . . . inexplicable why the Department of Homeland Security needs so much ammunition."  Rep. John Tierney (D-MA) at the opening of the hearing ridiculed the concerns as "conspiracy theories" which have "no place" in the committee room.

I happen to disagree with Rep. Tierney.  If this is nothing but a conspiracy theory, then the government should level with the American people on what the motivation is for purchasing those rounds.  The government gives us numerous reasons not to trust them.  If that isn't a conspiracy theory, then Tierney and his colleagues need to explain what's going on with this. 

To read the full story, click on the above link from FoxNews.com.

Gallup: Pelosi Least Liked Congressional Leader, and ‘Most Polarizing’

Gallup: Pelosi Least Liked Congressional Leader, and ‘Most Polarizing’ | CNS News

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi


According to a Gallup survey, House Minority Nancy Pelosi is viewed as the most "unfavorable" of the Congressional leaders by the American people and also the most polarizing.  In a survey, people were asked of their impression of the top four Congressional leaders.  Nancy Pelosi was viewed as unfavorable by 48% of the respondents, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was viewed unfavorable by 38% of the poll's respondents.  House Speaker John Boehner had a 41% unfavorable rating and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnel had a 34% unfavorable rating.  In terms of favorable, both Boehner and Pelosi tied, each earning 31%, Reid was 27% favorable and McConnell 26%.

To view the remainder of the results, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Senators Say Bombings Should Spark Immigration Reform, not Halt Process

Senators say bombings should spark immigration reform, not halt process | Fox News

Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Charles Schumer (D-NY)

The Boston-bombings and the foreign-born suspects have become part of the Capitol Hill debates to overhaul immigration law.  I tell you what they should do.  They should not allow any more foreigners to come to America's soil given the fact there are terrorists that cross our borders.  Secondly, they don't need to overhaul our current immigration laws.  The problem is our elected elite have refuse to enforce federal laws in regards to allowing illegals to cross our borders.  We need to seal our borders and the federal government needs to comply with the laws already on the books in dealing with illegal immigrants.  It's that simple.  The truth is both Congress and the president refuse to comply with the federal immigration laws.  That's why we have foreign terrorists on U.S. soil.  We can't allow America's borders to be open to anyone coming to our country.  It's a national security risk.  Also, any foreigner in America that has ties to any Islamic terrorist group needs to be deported.  We don't need jihadists hiding in the shadows plotting America's next attack.  That will always continually happen when we don't close America's porous borders. 

Another point I would like to make is any politician who supports amnesty for illegal aliens should be voted out in the next election cycle--regardless of party affiliation.  Both Democrats and Republicans, including Florida Senator Marco Rubio, are coming together to pass amnesty, which would give citizenship to those who are here illegally that have lived in America for some time.  Any immigrant who desires to become a U.S. citizenship should get in line to apply for U.S. citizenship.  That's the way it should be.  If they can't follow the rule of law to apply for U.S. citizenship then we don't need them here in America as citizens.  We shouldn't grant a group of illegals a right to citizenship if they don't go through the proper channels to become U.S. citizens.  Enough said.  To read the full story, click on the above link from FoxNews.com.

Boston Bombing Suspect Charge, Will not be Treated as Enemy Combatant

Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant | Fox News

Bombing suspect Dzokhar Tsarnaev

The White said Monday that the surviving suspect in the Boston Marathon won't be treated as an enemy combatant, which drew rebuke from GOP lawmakers who desired the administration to consider the option for the sake of intelligence gathering.  White House Press Secretary Jay Carney stated that he will prosecute this terrorist through the civilian system of justice. 

What needs to be done is to check which terrorist group he has ties with.  If he has any connection to Islamic terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda, then he needs to be treated an an enemy combatant.  Islamic terrorists should be handled through a military commission.  We're at war with Islamic terrorism and if he's involved with Al-Qaeda or any Islamic terrorist group, then he doesn't need to go through America's civilian court system. 

To read the full story, click on the above link from FoxNews.com.

Background Check Plan Defeated in Major Setback For Senate Gun Bill

Background check plan defeated in major setback for Senate gun bill | Fox News



The Senate last Wednesday defeated what was considered a "vital" background check amendment seen as the linchpin to Democrats' gun control bill, defeating a major setback to President Obama's agenda.  As a result, he lashed out at opponents in strong terms during his remarks from the Rose Garden.  The vote was 54-46, with supporters falling short of the 60-vote threshold. 

President Obama and his supporters believe in placing restrictions on those who seen to purchase a handgun.  I just wonder if placing a waiting period on those who seek to purchase a handgun will keep those guns out of the wrong hands?  I kind've doubt it.  Why don't we place waiting periods on purchasing other objects such as knives or boxcutters, for example.  There are murderers who use knives as weapons.  The terrorists aboard the four jets that crashed on 9/11 used boxcutters as weapons.  The truth is people kill people.  It's not the gun itself but the person who pulls the trigger we should be most concerned about.

To read the full story, click on the above link at FoxNews.com.

Boston Attack Underscores Growing Threat of IED's in America

Boston attack underscores growing threat of IEDs in America | Fox News



According to FoxNews.com, the deadly attack on the Boston Marathon highlights what might be a growing threat to American cities--the use of IED's to target large gatherings, which could inflict massive damage with a device that is difficult to detect.  Security experts says that the use of IED's are a preferred tool when it comes to terrorism in domestic or global attacks--even against the United States.  According to Bill Braniff, the executive director of the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and the Responses to Terrorism, stated, "The reason to use an IED or multiple IED's is that you're trying to create an oversized impact to cause as much disruption as possible."  I say that's very accurate.  IED's is a way to strike fear in the hearts of Americans. 

IED's are makeshift bombs that are extremely destructive when detonated.  They are designed to propel shrapnel and are sometimes used in combination with toxic chemicals, radiological material, or biological toxins.

What we saw take place Monday could be just the beginning of more of these devices to terrorize American cities in the United States.  To read the full story, click on the above link from FoxNews.com.