Ruth Bader Ginsberg Says the U.S. Constitution is Inferior

Supreme Court justice: U.S. Constitution inferior

 Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg says the U.S Constitution is inferior

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who was appointed by then President Bill Clinton to the U.S Supreme Court in 1993, says that if she were to write a new constitution now, she would look elsewhere to other countries to write a new constitution.  She says that the U.S. Constitution is inferior and outdated.  She was being interviewed by Al Hayat in Egypt, which is trying to develop a government after Egyptians citizens deposed longtime dictator Hosni Mubarak last year.  Egypt is having a difficult time assembling a "democratic" form of government as the Muslim Brotherhood as a political party has been assembling a majority in the country.  The goals of the Muslim Brotherhood is an Islamic caliphate worldwide.  Here's what she was asked: "Would your honor's advice be to get a part of other countries' constitutions as a model, or should we develop our own draft?"  She replied, "You should certainly be aided by all the constitution-writing that has gone on since the end of World War II.  I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012.  I might look at the constitution of South Africa.  That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary.  It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done." 

Here is a Supreme Court Justice that has sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution showing disdain for the Constitution.  That's of great concern to me.  Matthew Staver, chief of Liberty Counsel, says Justice Ginsberg's comments about our Constitution undermine the Supreme Court as an institution dedicated to the rule of law, as well as our founding document.  I concur with him on that.  You can tell that she has disdain for the Constitution according to the way she votes in Supreme Court rulings.  I want to declare to you the problem isn't the U.S. Constitution.  The problem is judges like Ruth Bader Ginsberg and America's elected elite shred the Constitution on a daily basis.  If she really believes the U.S. Constitution is inferior and outdated, then it would be wise if she should step down because her opinions are going to be biased because she doesn't believe in the U.S. Constitution.  She's not going to do that because she is one of the "wise judges" who knows what's best for our country.  She and other judges deliberately distort the Constitution to achieve their desired goals.  They have an agenda for this country that's unconstitutional.

We all hear from different politicians such as President Obama that the Constitution is a flawed document.  I personally don't believe that.  However, there is a provision within the Constitution to amend it.  It's through the amendment process.  There's a way to make changes to the Constitution.  The 27 Amendments to the Constitution throughout the 235 year process bears fact that the Constitution can be changed.  However, it must be changed democratically by approval 2/3's of the state legislatures.  Congress can't amend the Constitution on it's own.  President Obama, the Democrats in Congress, and Supreme Court justices such as Ruth Bader Ginsberg, for example, know their agenda never would be implemented through democratic means.  Therefore, they have to circumvent the Constitution to push their agenda on the American people.  That's what they're doing.  The problem isn't the inferiority of the Constitution.  The Constitution is one of the greatest documents ever in the history of the world.  The problem are those who hide behind black robes that are traitors to the Constitution.  Those that are traitors to the Constition also extend to both Houses of Congress and President Obama.