Powered By Blogger

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Supreme Court Rules 5-4 That Defense of Marriage Act is Unconstitutional

Supreme Court Rules 5-4 That Defense of Marriage Act is Unconstitutional | CNS News

gay marriage, doma

The Supreme Court ruled this past Wednesday that legally-married same-sex couples should receive the same benefits as heterosexual couples.  The court invalidated a provision of the federal Defense of Marriage Act which has prevented "married" gay couples from receiving the same range of tax, retirement, and health benefits that are generally available.  The vote was 5-4 and Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion. 

I knew this was eventually going to happen.   It doesn't make any difference what the Constitution says or what 200+ years of law says, our Supreme Court justices are going to discard all of that and rule in favor of an abomination.  Gay marriage is not of God.  God spelled it out specificaly in His word that marriage is between a man and a woman ONLY!!  You couldn't be much plainer than that.  This is nothing but a work of Satan.  Gay marriage is very perverted and twisted.  It's part of the globalist agenda to destroy the social foundation of America.  It's happening! 

To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Friday, June 21, 2013

Obama Wants to Cut Nuclear Arms, Seeks Talks With Russia

Obama wants to cut nuclear arms, seeks talks with Russia | Reuters

U.S. President Barack Obama embraces German Chancellor Angela Merkel outside the Chancellery in Berlin, June 19, 2013. REUTERS-Thomas PeterPresident Barack Obama with German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

President Obama wants to reduce deployed nuclear weapons up to a third and revive negotiations with Russia to "move beyond Cold War nuclear postures", according to a speech he gave Wednesday in Berlin. 

Reducing the U.S.'s nuclear weapon arsenal isn't a wise choice considering the problems we have with threats from Iran and North Korea.  This false notion that if the U.S. reduces its nuclear stockpile is going to convince the world to follow suit and reduce their nuclear stockpile is foolish thinking.  America cannot be strong by reducing the amount of weapons we have on hand.  We need to maintain a first class defense system in this world.  If one thinks Russia and North Korea, for example, are going to reduce their nuclear stockpile because the U.S. does, is in denial.  They will keep on building their nuclear arsenal and outsmart the U.S. 

In the statements I just made, I'm in no way gung-ho in America being the world's policeman and trying to bring democracy throughout the world.  We shouldn't intervene in other nation's affairs unless it threatens America's or the Western Hemisphere's security interests.  But we do need to be the world's best when it comes to our nation's defense system.  We don't want be helpless in case we're attacked by a foreign enemy.

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Happy Father's Day!

Sunday is Father's Day



WHAT MAKES A DAD

God took the strength of a mountain,
The majesty of a tree,
The warmth of a summer sun,
The calm of a quiet sea,
The generous soul of nature,
The comforting arm of night,
The wisdom of the ages,
The power of the eagle's flight,
The joy of a morning in spring,
The faith of a mustard seed,
The patience of eternity,
The depth of a family need,
Then God combined these qualities,
When there was nothing more to add,
He knew his masterpiece was complete,
And so, He called it...Dad

Saturday, June 15, 2013

Rand Paul to Illegals: ‘We Will Find a Place for You;' Envisions 12 Million ‘New Taxpayers’

Rand Paul to Illegals: ‘We Will Find a Place for You;' Envisions 12 Million ‘New Taxpayers’ | CNS News

Rand PaulSenator Rand Paul (R-KY) speaking at CPAC on March 14, 2013.

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul in a prepared text for a speech he delivered Wednesday at the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference said to illegal aliens who desire to live and work in the United States, "We will find a place for you."  Paul also envisioned today's illegal aliens becoming additional "taxpayers."  I have a question for Senator Paul?  Why do you waste your time trying to cater to those who are here in the United States illegally?  I understand there are those here who come to work.  However, there's a proper way to handle those who are here illegally.  That's not to grant amnesty to them or make special provisions for them to be in the United States.  I have no issue with citizens from other countries who desire to immigrate to the United States as long as they go through the proper channel to either become U.S. citizens or legal residents, whichever the case may be.  What Senator Paul needs to be doing is to be pushing for a border fence to be build in the Southwestern part of the U.S. from Texas to California.  After that those that are here illegally needed to be tracked down and documented.  They need to be told if they want to work here, then they need work permits.  If they desire to eventually become U.S. citizens, then they need to go through the same procedure as those who do come into the U.S. legally.  It's not right to grant special privileges to those who are here illegally.  They should get in line to apply for U.S. citizenship and go through the proper procedures in obtaining U.S. citizenship.  Our elected elite don't want to do it that way.  Our elected elite are trying to flood this country with illegals and totally transform America into a Third World country. 

I have never suggested that the solution to the illegal immigration was to automatically deport all those who are here illegally back to their country of origin, unless they have a criminal or homicide record.  However, we don't need to overlook those who are here in our country who haven't been properly documented.  If they're here, they need to be asked what their intentions are for being in the U.S.  If they are here to work, then give them work permits and have a file on them.  If there are illegals here who would like to become U.S. citizens, then make them get in line and fill out the proper paperwork in obtaining citizenship.  However, giving free medical care, free education, and drivers' licenses to those who are here illegally must stop.  Illegals shouldn't be entitled to free handouts.  They shouldn't be given free benefits on the backs of hardworking citizens whose tax dollars support this kind of nonsense. 

Senator Paul is just another politician who is purchasing air time to raise his profile so he can seek higher office someday, such as the presidency in 2016.  To read the full  story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Friday, June 14, 2013

Rep. Slaughter Invokes Name of Two Pro-Lifers to Support New York Pro-Abortion Bill

Rep. Slaughter Invokes Name of Two Pro-Lifers to Support New York Pro-Abortion Bill | CNS News

louise slaughterRep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY)

Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) has invoked the name of two pro-lifers to support a sweeping pro-abortion in the New York state legislature.  Slaughter invoked the name of suffragist Susan B. Anthony, an ardent pro-lifer to support this monstrous bill in the New York state legislature.  New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is looking to codify the Roe vs. Wade case into state law, which would guarantee that abortion is legal in New York if something were to happen that the 1973 Supreme Court case Roe vs. Wade were to be overturned.  The 10-point bill named the "Women's Equality Act" will tackle other issues as equal pay and anti-discrimination measures.  "Since the time of Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, New York has been a national leader for women's equality and fairness," Slaughter stated in a statement last week.  "Leaders on women's rights at the federal level need good partners at the state level, and I'm proud of the package Governor Cuomo has outlined to improve women's rights throughout our great state." 

How abominable to invoke early suffragists Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton on a pro-abortion bill in New York.  Both early suffragists were pro-life.  I know they both were the leaders of the early feminist movement, but the early feminist movement wasn't about abortion.  The early feminist leaders were concerned about the plight of children.  They even supported the temperance movement, which was opposed to the use of alcohol.  Tell me of a modern-day feminist that's opposed to the sale and consumption of alcohol in today's society.  I wouldn't even call today's modern feminist movement the "feminist movement".  I call them the unisex movement.  They've tried to remove distinctions between men and women for the last few decades.  The truth is there are God-given difference amongst the sexes and you can't deny it, no matter how much you try to.  The Susan B. Anthony List is an organization that supports pro-life candidates.  To use their names on a pro-abortion bill in New York is very disgusting.  Abortion is murder and it's inhumane.  To sanction such a measure just shows how evil and corrupt the New York politicians are.  God help us.  To read the article, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Senate Immigration Bill Clears First Hurdles, Still Faces Tough Republican Opposition

Senate immigration bill clears first hurdles, still faces tough Republican opposition | Fox News


Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Minority Whip Jon Cornyn (R-TX) speak with reporters on Capitol Hill.

The Senate passed preliminary, along with key votes Tuesday in its march to the approval of allowing amnesty for illegals into the United States.  Fox News said it was sweeping, bipartisan immigration reform.  I don't deny that it's bipartisan since both politicial parties are in support of this bill.  I believe it will be a matter of time before the full Senate votes for this bill.  Since the first step has been taken for the two procedural votes to place this bill formally before the Senate and open for amendments, then it will be a matter of time before the Senate approves this immigration bill.  Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), said that the 60-vote majority He said the bill has serious flaws.

As far as I'm concerned, the whole bill is flawed.  However, it doesn't make any difference whether it's flawed or not when it comes to passing Congress.  The Affordable Care Act of 2010 is flawed, but it still passed Congress.  They don't care.  As long as the socialist agenda to radically transform America is passed, that's all that matter.  I guarantee you if this is the bill that Obama wants passed, it will passed, regardless how many Senators he has to bribe to make it happen.  I'll assure you that.  To read the full story, click on the above link from FoxNews.com.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Southern Baptists Consider Resolution on Scouting

Southern Baptists consider resolution on scouting | CNS News

Southern Baptists
Fred Luter Jr. pointing upward after being re-elected as the Southern Baptist Convention's president for a second time. 

Southern Baptist convention leaders have proposed a resolution expressing their opposition to the Boy Scouts of America's new policy allowing gay scouts.  The resolution also calls on for the Boy Scouts to remove from executive and board leadership the individuals who earlier sought to allow gays as both members and leaders without consulting the many religious groups that sponsor Scout troops.  While the resolution doesn't recommend that Southern Baptists drop ties with the Scouts, it expresses support for those churches and families that decide to do so. 

I have a perfect resolution for the Southern Baptist Convention.  The convention should have no ties with the Boy Scouts.  Any previous ties that the convention has held with the Boy Scouts should be immediately dropped.  NO qualms about it.  They shouldn't sponsor them nor be a part of their organization given the fact the current leadership of the Boy Scouts of America wants to welcome homosexual Scouts as leaders.  Not only that but any of the leadership of the Southern Baptist Convention that still supports the Scouts or is sympathetic to the Scouts (since they're welcoming homosexual Scouts into the organization), then they shouldn't be serving in any capacity in the Southern Baptist Convention.  Sodomy is an abomination in God's eyes and Romans 1 makes that abundantly clear.  The church has no business in yoking up with any organization that sanctions anything that's a direct violation to God's word.  Sodomy is a direct violation of God's word.  The Southern Baptist Convention needs to drop all support from the Boy Scouts of America.  I know that sounds bold but that's the truth.  God says the church isn't to mix with the world.  You can't support an organization that sanctions something as abominable as sodomy.

To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Is Our Guardian Angel Big Brother?--Pat Buchanan

Is Our Guardian Angel Big Brother? | CNS News



Pat Buchanan wrote another interesting articles for CNS News concerning the issue of Big Brother.  Over the past weekend, the news has revolved around the U.S. government surveillance program and Big Brother spying on us.  Anybody that's paid attention to the news since 9/11 shouldn't be surprised the government to hear about the government spying on us.  The person who set this surveillance program into motion was George W. Bush in 2001 when he signed the Patriot Act a month following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.  The Patriot Act has enabled the government to further encroach upon our freedoms.  Of course, President Obama will take things further than what his predecessor did.  I can recall either in 2006 or 2007 when they're were speaking of illegal wiretapping in the news during the Bush administration as a mean to track down terrorists.  I can remember how members of the media were seemingly disturbed over that.  This is nothing to be surprised at. 

To read Pat Buchanan's article, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Obama: 'We Don't Want to Tax All Businesses Out of Business'

Obama: 'We Don't Want to Tax All Businesses Out of Business' | CNS News

obama

So, in other words, there are some businesses that you do desire to tax out of business.  Is that correct Mr. President?  President Obama wouldn't agree to what I just said it but the way he worded it he was in essence saying there are some businesses that he wants to tax out of business.  Some corporations such as General Electric or Berkshire Hathaway, for example, he doesn't want to tax out of business.  I'm certain he makes certain that those corporations hardly pay anything in the way of taxes.  Why do I say that?  Because the heads of those corporations such as Jeffrey Immelt and Warren Buffett, supported Obama in his re-election campaign.  Obama will take care of his cronies in the business world.  I've made the statement that President is destroying capitalism with his taxation and regulation policies.  That is true.  But those businesses he's not interested in them succeeding.  There are some huge corporations that play a role in Obama's agenda to create a one-world government and destroy America as we know it.  Those businesses will be okay.  He will reward them for supporting his administration and advancing his socialist agenda.  But any business that plays no role in the administration's socialist agenda, he's going to make it difficult for them to succeed.  They will have to abide by the regulations set forth by the Affordable Care Act, for example.  I guarantee you G.E. probably won't have to.  That's the way it works in Obama's universe.

To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Sunday, June 9, 2013

Beck: Not a Jew Alive if Hitler Had Obama's Tech

Beck: Not a Jew alive if Hitler had Obama’s tech


Glenn Beck

I guarantee you that every Jew that's alive today is very glad that Adolf Hitler didn't have the surveillance technology that America possesses today.  If Hitler had the video cameras and spy technology that 21st century America possesses today, then the number of Jews murdered during the Holocaust would have far surpassed the six million Jews that were gassed in the late 30's and 40's.  The number would have been in the millions.  It would pale in comparison to the six million several decades ago.  It's very scary when you consider how vast our technology is today.  With the internet, social networking, surveillance cameras, and the list continues, the Jews wouldn't have a chance at hiding back in the 1940's.  Video cameras would've caught them everywhere.  It would've been tragic.  If another "Hitler" arises and becomes president of the United States, then Jews, Christians, and those that oppose the U.S. government's regime would be slaughtered.  It would be a bloodbath in the United States.

To read the full story and watch the video of Glenn Beck, click on the above link from WND.