Powered By Blogger

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

In 59 Philadelphia Voting Divisions, Mitt Romney Received Zero Votes

In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes - Philly.com

Former GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney

I made the statement following the election last week that I wouldn't be surprised if there was voter fraud that took place during the election.  Any state that doesn't require some form of voter I.D. is bound to have some election fraud.  I can't prove that but if the truth were known, we would probably be surprised.  I do recognize that various neighborhoods in Philadephia are Democratic and predominantly black.  However, it makes you wonder.  Larry Sabato, a political scientist at the University of Virginia who has studied black precincts, stated that he's occassionally seen 100 percent of the vote go towards the Democratic candidate, such as Chicago and Atlanta, for example in 2008 when John McCain was the GOP candidate.  Sabato said, "I'd be surprised if there weren't a handful of precincts that didn't cast a vote for Romney." "But the number of zero precincts in Philadelphia deserves examination," Sabato added.  I believe he's right.

To read the full story, click on the above link from Philly.com.

Monday, November 12, 2012

Obama's Secret (and Illegal) Regulatory Bomb

Obama's secret (and illegal) regulatory bomb | The Daily Caller



Get ready for some new job-crushing regulations that will make it very difficult if not impossible for business to thrive in the marketplace.  One thing's for certain: If the key provisions of Obamacare are fully implemented in 2014, it will cause the economy to go into a nosedive.  Businesses will have to lay off hundreds of employees because the onerous regulations that accompanies Obamacare will make the costs of operating a business ever more costly.  And that's just from one bill.  There are all types of stipulations from other laws passed under the Obama administration, such as the Dodd-Frank bill passed in 2010.  Also you have these agencies such as the EPA that bypass Congress and create their own regulations on small businesses in the private sector.

Phil Kerpen mentioned that under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, President Obama is required by law to submit his regulatory agenda to Congress twice a year, April and October.  Consequently, President Obama has been breaking the law and hasn't been submitting his regulatory agenda to Congress.  This is just another example of President Obama bypassing the Congress.  He doesn't care about the rule of law or the Constitution.  He only uses the Constitution when it suits his agenda.  Otherwise, he ignores it.  President Obama has signed numerous executive orders as president.  America is being set up to have a dictatorship running it.  You may not believe it but just wait. 

To read the full story, click on the above link from the Daily Caller.

Saturday, November 10, 2012

Obama: My Re-Election Proves Americans Want the Wealthy to Pay More in Taxes

Obama: My Re-Election Proves Americans Want the Wealthy to Pay More in Taxes | Video | TheBlaze.com

Obama: My Re Election Proves Americans Want the Wealthy to Pay More in Taxes

President Obama before addressing a crowd

President Obama stated in his weekly address today that his re-election proves that Americans want taxes raised on the wealthy combined with spending cuts to reduce the deficit.  Obama stated the we can't cut our way to prosperity.  He claimed if we're serious about the deficit we have to combine spending cuts with revenue.  Revenue is a buzz word for raising taxes.  One thing I"ll assure you: Taxes will be raised.  It won't just be on the wealthy that have incomes of $250,000 or above.  Everyone will be impacted negatively with raised taxes, including the poor.  However, that's his goal.  He is a believer in the redistribution of wealth.  That's what will take place in his second term.  He's a Marxist in his thinking and we're seeing America being transformed into a Marxist country.  He's already taken charge of the mortgage and auto industry.  He tries to dictate what our economy should produce and sell, such as so-called "clean energy" with solar energy, for example.  I'm all for exploring alternative methods of energy, but it's not the place of the federal government to dictate what should be sold in marketplace. 

President Obama's re-election Tuesday evening is no affirmation that Americans want taxes raised on the wealthy.  Even if it were true, that still is wrong.  Nobody has a right to take from the wealthy because they are wealthy.  Those that earned their wealth honestly deserve to keep their wealth.  They shouldn't be penalized and have to pay a progressive tax rate because they are wealthy.  I have an idea for the president. (which I know he won't listen to).  We should abolish the current tax code and institute a flat tax where everybody that works a job should pay a certain percentage in taxes.  Those that earn more will pay more in real dollars, but at least they're not being punished because they earn more money.  That's just right.  I know there are wealthy crooks in America.  But that doesn't justify punishing an entire class of wealthy people simply because they make more money.  Those that made their money dishonestly should be punished individually for it.  It shouldn't affect those that haven't cheated when it comes to earning money. 

I said this last year and I'll say it again: President Obama and his Democratic cohorts should pay 40% extra above what they already pay in taxes.  Since they're such stern believers that the wealthy should pay more in taxes, then they need to lead the way.  It's rank hypocrisy for the president and Congressional leaders such as Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, to name a few, to suggest the wealthy should pay more in taxes without paying more themselves.  I'm very perturbed over the very pathetic state of affairs in Washington, D.C. today. 

To read the full article, click on the above link from The Blaze.

Friday, November 9, 2012

Speaker Boehner: It's Time For You to Step Aside

Boehner: 'Mr. President, This Is Your Moment. We’re Ready to Be Led' | CNSNews.com

John Boehner crying on 60 Minutes



Boehner to Obama: This is Your Moment



On Wednesday House Speaker John Boehner held a press briefing on Capitol Hill where he congratulated Barack Obama on his second term victory Tuesday evening.  He indicated that Republicans in Congress were ready to be led by him.  "Mr. President, this is your moment, we're ready to be led," said Boehner "Not as Democrats or Republicans but as Americans.  We want you to lead not as a liberal or conservative but as president of the United States of America."  So Mr. Boehner is going to roll over and allow President Obama to have his way.  At least that's the way it appears.  Boehner knows how the president's going to lead.  That's no surprise.  He's going to lead like a Marxist.  As far as the "liberal" and "conservative" labels are concerned, it's not so much the ideology that's important.  What's important is that the president leads according to the U.S. Constitution.  That's something the last several presidents have ignored.  President Obama is no exception.  Obama said when campaigning for president the first time that he wants to fundamentally transform America.  He's doing a great job accomplishing his agenda with no genuine Republican opposition.

Speaker Boehner, if you're truly willing to be led by President Obama, then you need to step aside and resign as House Speaker.  We don't need a crybaby leading the House for another two years.  We know what you're idea of working with the president means.  It means rolling over and allowing President Obama to have his way.  You haven't followed through any of the campaign promises you made in 2010 when you and fellow House Republicans unveiled the document, "A Pledge to America."  Government keeps on growing and spending is still out of control.  You won't utilize the power the Constitution has given to you to defund unconstitutional spending, such as Obamacare, for example.  We can't afford another two years of your compromising with the president.  You're a joke.  You need to go back to Ohio to run a business where you live, which is something you do best. 

Go onto Jim Sumpter's website at JimSumpter.com and you'll see a picture of House Speaker John Boehner wearing a dress.  It says, "Send Boehner a dress.  He already has enough mascara."  It says on the right hand corner to click for the address.  Please do so and you can send him a dress.  Finally, click on the above link from CNSNews.com and read the full story.

Thursday, November 8, 2012

Top House Conservative: Romney ‘Most Liberal Republican Nominee in History’

Top House Conservative: Romney ‘Most Liberal Republican Nominee in History’ | CNSNews.com

Rep. Jim JordanRep. Jim Jordan (R-OH)

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who was the chairman on the House Republican Study Committee (which is the caucus of the conservatives in the House) said on Wednesday that the Republican presidential campaign of Mitt Romney was hampered because he was the most liberal Republican nominee in the history of the United States.  That is true.  However, I'm not going to insinuate that the only reason Mitt Romney lost was because he was a liberal Republican nominee.  I believe there were other factors involved such as possible voting fraud, the influx of illegal immigration over the years, and the fact that an increasing number of Americans just don't care.  There's a segment of people who believe the government owes them a living.  We're seeing more people that feel they are entitled.  I believe those are a few of the reasons that Barack Obama won re-election.  It's tragic but I do believe it's part of God's judgment on America.  We're living in dark days and it's high time to realize that trying to change Washington is virtually impossible, from the vantage point I'm seeing.  If it were a possibility, we would need voters all across the nation to jump on board and vote out their incumbents.  But we don't have those kind of voters.  There aren't too many voters that will vote on principle.  Too many vote based on what feels good to them.  I don't know all the results yet to render my opinion on why Romney lost the election.  I do know the fact given he was a weak candidate who ran a very poor campaign didn't help his cause.  Time will reveal the truth.

To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

OH NO! Four More Years

Obama: "The Best Is Yet to Come" | NBC Chicago


In his victory President Obama said
President Barack Obama on election night

Election Coverage Fox News (Part 1)



Fox News Announces Re-election of Barack Obama



Last night was a sad night.  As soon as I heard Fox News call the state of Ohio for Barack Obama, I knew that the election was over with.  There was no way that Mitt Romney had a chance to recover once Ohio was called for Obama.  With Obama winning Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Iowa, I knew that the only chance Mitt Romney would have to pull off this election would be to win Virginia, Ohio, and Florida.  Romney had no other choice.  I knew it would be an impossibility given the fact that Florida and Ohio were too close to call.  Everything was rolling into Obama's favor.  What does the future hold?  It looks very bleak.  If God doesn't intervene in the next four years, then America won't be the America we once knew. 

To read the full story, click on the above link.  Also watch the YouTube clips covering the election of Barack Obama.  Also, Florida and Virginia are too close to call at this time.

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Will the 2012 Election be the Most Important Election in Our Nation's History?

  

For years I've heard many conservative media pundits proclaim how important this particular election is.  I've heard in 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, to name a few, that this is the most important election ever in the history of our country.  I've heard radio talk show hosts Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and others make that statement.  I remember hearing in 2004 the importance of that particular presidential year.  America was fighting a "war on terror" in both Afghanistan and Iraq.  There were a couple of Supreme Court justices that were slated to retire.  We heard that it was important to re-elect George W. Bush because the balance of the court was dependent upon whom we elected as president.  If John Kerry were to win, then liberal, pro-abortion justices would be appointed and it would tip the bala-nce of the court to the leftists.  We also heard that year that we needed Bush because we were fighting two wars in the Middle East and we needed a Commander-in-chief that wasn't soft on terrorism.  Kerry was a very liberal Senator from Massachusetts and many were fearful that Bush's agenda to fight terrorism would be rolled back if Kerry were to win the presidency that year.  Bush happened to win the election that year.

The sad truth of the matter is that regardless whom we elect to the Oval Office or in Congress, the socialist agenda moves forward regardless if it's George W. Bush or Barack Obama.  House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has stated that elections don't matter.  I'm afraid there's a lot of truth in that.  Why?  Because so-called conservative Republicans do nothing to stop the Obama agenda.  They allow President Obama and his Democratic colleagues to have their way.  House Speaker John Boehner and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor are worthless as House leaders.  Neither one have accomplished what they said they would do once the Republicans assumed control of the House in 2011.  The size and scope of government continues growing.  Federal spending keeps on ever increasing.  Obamacare is still fully-funded.  That's in spite of the fact Republicans have the power in the House to eliminate wasteful spending from the budget.  There's no difference between the Democrats and Republicans on the federal level.  With that being the case, how significant is this electio?.

Today is election day.  Don't forget to take time to vote.  We definitely need to vote out Barack Obama.  If he's re-elected today, then be prepared to see this country become a fascist nation.  Mitt Romney is far from perfect.  He's liberal himself.  I don't trust Romney.  However, I would rather take a chance on a man who has good family values and knows how the economy should run rather than vote for the incumbent president who is married to the ideology of Marxism.  He embraces the philosophy of Saul Alinsky.  I'm not going to say that this is the most important election ever in the history of this nation.  However, I'm going to say that it's clearly evident if we allow Barack Obama another four years as president, there's no telling what will happen to America. 

Monday, November 5, 2012

Voter Fraud Charges Begin in Ohio

Voter Fraud Charges Begin in Ohio



According to Newsmax, there are possible voter fraud charges in the state of Ohio, which is a battleground state essential to the winner of this year's presidential election.  Both Mitt Romney and Barack Obama have high stakes in the Buckeye state.  Alex Triantafilou, a member of the elections board and chairman of the County's Republican party, told Fox News that election officials fear more widespread fraud. 

Nothing surprises me.  I expect there will be a lot of election fraud tomorrow.  President Obama is going to do everything he can to maintain his hold on power.  So don't be surprised to find a lot of fraud taking place in tomorrow's election.  Click on the above link to read the full story from Newsmax.

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Gallup: Obama's Early Vote Advantage Collapses 22-Points Over 2008

Gallup: Obama's Early Vote Advantage Collapses 22-Points Over 2008

President Barack Obama and GOP candidate Mitt Romney at a presidential debate.   According to Gallup, GOP candidate Mitt Romney is leading President Barack Obama by seven points, 52% - 45% in early voting.  Almost 4 years ago, then Senator Barack Obama held a 15-point lead over Senator John McCain that year.  Of course Barack Obama went on to beat John McCain very comfortably in the election that year.  This doesn't mean that Mitt Romney will win the election because he's leading in early voting.  The momentum appears to be headed in Mitt Romney's favor.  If the momentum carries in the swing states in the Midwest, then Romney has a chance to win the presidency.  Let's pray that Romney wins.   To read the full story, click on the link above.